Home > Fatal Error > Fatal Error Inserting Padlock_sha

Fatal Error Inserting Padlock_sha

Code: modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/ No such device As I understand it, it's no big deal, the padlock_sha refers to some hardware encryption chip by VIA that I (and The time now is 07:33 PM. vBulletin ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. And what kernel are you running now? have a peek at these guys

thanks, bepaald __________________ Running F20 x86_64 with KDE Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.5GHz 8G RAM bepaald View Public Profile Find all posts by bepaald #11 12th August 2009, 03:04 Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications. I have one assumption: when performance test starts for sha algo, kernel crypto hash api try to load all *sha.ko, including padlock-sha.ko but this is wrong if you get VIA PadLock Also we are using IB for Lnet. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=224883

Comments? Jun 28 07:04:29 localhost kernel: padlock: VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected. I'm closing this. It would be very much appreciated if someone could point me in the right direction as searching the net for an answer has hit a brick wall.

Hide Permalink Vinod Kumar added a comment - 19/Nov/13 10:03 AM We are seeing a similar issue. Iniciando o udev: ^[%G^[[60G[^[[0;32m OK ^[[0;39m]^M Definindo o nome da m√°quina blackpad.lan.raisama.net: ^[[60G[^[[0;32m OK ^[[0;39m]^M mdadm: No arrays found in config file or automatically modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/ No kbish (kbish) wrote on 2008-11-05: #25 I confirm this bug on Ubuntu 8.10. I just added a space between "swap," and "cipher" so that it looked like this "...swap, cipher=..." in my /etc/crypttab.

I have not tried the blacklist teak yet. mplayer CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf9ff8000 irq 22' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC1200' Components : 'HDA:10ec0888,104382fe,00100101' Controls : 41 Simple Did the error disappear for you after updating from updates-testing? Suggestions for F11?

Configurando o Gerenciamento de Volumes Lógicos: 3 logical volume(s) in volume group "VolGroup00" now active ^[[60G[^[[0;32m OK ^[[0;39m]^M Verificando sistemas de arquivos /dev/mapper/luks-42593326-2028-449b-94e2-7a7d61f68701: clean, 971754/2632672 files, 8437918/10526215 blocks /dev/sda1: clean, 44/25896 Comment 22 Matthieu Pupat 2010-11-03 09:46:19 EDT It appears automatically at boot time. Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug. I see modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.38-11-generic/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device during boot up.

I have it on fresh FC13 install. https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-1599 Debian Bug tracker #464673 Debian Bug tracker #568008 URL: The information about this bug in Launchpad is automatically pulled daily from the remote bug. I'd like to get the relevant logging from each of you on your respective environments. But I know for sure that I see the problem on uptodate Live USBs - I just haven't had time to verify exactly the same commands with exactly the same kernel.

I plan to stay with this same installation of Hardy as I move forward, but I am collecting (implementing) various bug fixes as I use it. (Sorry to get off topic http://radionasim.com/fatal-error/fatal-error-605.php neferty (roman-semko) wrote on 2009-10-02: #46 Same here after today's "beta" updates. :-/ Ubuntu QA Website (ubuntuqa) on 2009-11-17 tags: added: iso-testing simovaris (sercet) wrote on 2010-02-12: #47 Same problem here is klogged cryptsetup is obviously very security sensitive, and it is important that users get a feeling that it is secure. This data should be used for best default algorithm selection for osc-ost interaction. >>padlock: VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected.

Type stupid long messages? PS: anyway I'm using ubuntu 11.04 32 bit (2.6.38-8-generic), it boots fine and everything seems to work (with the exception of the modprobe message at boot time) Joao Mendes (badseed-pt) wrote Blacklisting padlock-sha did though. http://radionasim.com/fatal-error/fatal-error-inserting-lustre-input-output-error.php I have discovered something that it probably obvious to most but clearly wasn't to me.

I have not done any test with other versions of Fedora or with the live CD. Subscribing... The same error is reported here by an user of the serverkernel: * http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=4567140 Is this warning fixable?

Jan Groenewald (jan-aims) wrote on 2010-10-04: #50 Confirmed on lucid 64bit server 0 [email protected]:/var/log#cat daemon.log|grep sha Aug 23 16:52:12 oystercatcher modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.32-24-server/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device Sep 1

Thanks, John Adv Reply October 29th, 2010 #2 john_mc View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message 5 Cups of Ubuntu Join Date Jul 2008 Beans 19 Re: Modprobe: FATAL error This seemed to fix my issue with not being able to decrypt the partition. Me, 08/05 Offline #2 2008-03-22 20:28:53 tomk Forum Fellow From: Ireland Registered: 2004-07-21 Posts: 9,839 Re: Sorta Fixed: Warning: Error inserting padlock_aes .. If this fatal message confuse, you can blacklist padlock-sha module.

Content ©Intel CorporationTerms of Use*TrademarksCookiesPrivacy Atlassian FAQ Forum Quick Links Unanswered Posts New Posts View Forum Leaders FAQ Contact an Admin Forum Community Forum Council FC Agenda Forum Governance Forum Staff dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1611:bd11/26/2008:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5Q:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer starslights (starslights) wrote on 2009-09-23: AlsaDevices.txt padlock-sha.ko was not loaded cause you have no VIA PadLock Hash Engine hardware. news It seldomly boots normally though.

It wasn't my intention to set it to rawhide. Ubuntu Logo, Ubuntu and Canonical © Canonical Ltd. Subscribing... Is it likely that this will be fixed in Hardy soon anyway?

In looking around I see this was a bug (or feature) back in 2008 that can be resolve by blacklisting the module padlock_sa. It's not really the fault of the tools, but instead that the module doesn't initialize because the hardware is not present. Opts: (null) and later many of these : May 9 21:02:05 schambrin-laptop kernel: [ 66.786117] Valid eCryptfs headers not found in file header region or xattr region May 9 21:02:05 schambrin-laptop Opts: errors=remount-ro May 9 21:01:31 schambrin-laptop kernel: [ 32.621565] EXT4-fs (sda5): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.

Nov 18 07:03:35 st61 modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.32-358.18.1.el6_lustre.x86_64/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device Nov 18 07:03:39 st61 kernel: Lustre: Lustre: Build Version: 2.4.1-RC2--PRISTINE-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6_lustre.x86_64 This happens when we are loading Lustre on padlock-sha.ko was not loaded cause you have no VIA PadLock Hash Engine hardware. It's also reproduceable from the console: [19:56:48]bash:~$ uname -r 2.6.24-12-generic [19:56:54]bash:~$ sudo modprobe sha256 [sudo] password for adnarim: WARNING: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.24-12-generic/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device See original description Tags: apport-collected Comment 10 Andre Cruz 2009-10-02 19:14:17 EDT An additional information: In FC11, the bug only happens if the partition is encrypted after the updates.

If, due to the nature of the issue you have encountered, you are unable to run this command, please add a comment stating that fact and change the bug status to I got error messages during boot. Aliasing module helps.